Should FBA Deport Reparations Denier Conservative Steven Crowder?
Canadian Steven Crowder Violated the 1965 Naturalization & Immigration Act And Exploited the Racial Tensions of "Black Fatigue." Does the First Generation Immigrant Qualify for Deportation?
In a Plano barbershop known for sharp fades and sharper conversations, conservative commentator and media personality Steven Crowder walked into a barbershop of black men. An encounter captured on Crowder’s YouTube web series Black & White on the Gray Issues, aired on October 9, featured Crowder in a heated and, at times, contentious exchange about school choice, diversity initiatives, reparations, and racial identity in America. But could Crowder end up paying a hefty price as a result of this interview?
This Is More Than a Conversation
Crowder, known for his controversial Change My Mind segments, sought common ground on topics like DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) and “Black fatigue.” But participants quickly pushed back against what they perceived as Crowder’s attempts to minimize the systemic impact of racial history in the United States.
“Don’t come in here acting like you understand what we’ve lived,” one barber snapped. “You don’t know the cost of being Black in this country.”
Crowder’s first mistake was arguing against cash reparations for descendants of American chattel slavery — a position he framed as opposition to “race-based entitlement” — its in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court’s ruling about citizens with Freedmen status in Students for Fair Admissions (2023). The opinion of the 2023 Supreme Court that the Fourteenth Amendment permits state actors to remedy the effects of race-based societal discrimination through explicitly race-based measures.
Justice Thomas wrote in his dissent “The government can plainly remedy a race-based injury that it has inflicted—though such remedies must be meant to further a colorblind government, not perpetuate racial consciousness. Race-based government measures during the 1860’s and 1870’s to remedy state-enforced slavery were . . . not inconsistent with the colorblind Constitution.” See id., at 505 (majority opinion). 551 U. S., at 772, n. 19 (THOMAS, J., concurring).
“Legislation for a particular class of the blacks to the exclusion of all whites”
Several attendees criticized his views as dismissive of centuries of unpaid labor, generational trauma, and ongoing inequality. One man called the stance “psychologically violent,” arguing that Crowder’s dismissal of reparations contributes to what he called “Black fatigue” — the exhaustion from constantly having to explain basic historical facts to outsiders.
Citizenship and Identity: The Elephant in the Room
Crowder’s status as a dual citizen of Canada and the United States was not lost on the crowd. Some barbers raised questions about his national allegiance and his moral authority to weigh in on foundational U.S. policy discussions. Since the episode aired activists called for investigations into Crowder’s citizenship status and the jurisdiction of his parents at birth. In alignment with Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship, the descendants of the enslaved - owners of the Fourteenth Amendment- question the validity of Crowder’s immigration status when Steven was born.
FBA suspect Steven Crowder’s parents were not legal citizens, or under the jurisdiction, of the United States when Steven was born in 1981. Crowder’s Canadian parents might have been in violation of Section 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (66. Stat. 175; 8 U.S.C. 1153) and not of good moral character. Not being of good mora character would explain why their son continues to not adhere to the principles of the Constitution.
Others went further and suggested Crowder’s anti-reparations stance undermines the core constitutional protections owed to the families of the colored Union soldiers — citizens with Freedmen status under the 14th Amendment — descendants of enslaved people who were granted birthright citizenship after winning the Civil War for the Union.
Executive Orders and the Political Undercurrent
The barbershop conversation violates a series of federal Executive Orders issued in 2025 and coincides with the descendants of former US chattel slaves invoking their Freedmen status and earning how to revoke the citizenship of immigrants.
Crowder’s conversation publicly promoted conspiring to impede federal law including prohibiting a targeted group of Americans from freely exercising their First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances and restorative measures. Possibly a violation of the Racketeer-Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act, Crowder is promoting ignorance in race based remedies for past governmental discrimination is legal and must be tailored to address that particular past governmental discrimination.
In violation of Trump’s April 2025 Executive Order “Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens,” Crowder’s dialogue could be seen as a public confession. Crowder public confessed to favoring aliens who identify as “White” [Anglo-Saxon Europeans] over the Constitutionally protected families of the colored Union soldiers and citizens with Freedmen status.
In the opinion of the United States Supreme Court to remedy the effects of race-based societal discrimination the “precedent explicitly requires any attempt to compensate victims of past governmental discrimination must be concrete and traceable to the de jure segregated system.” The opinion for the Supreme Court reaffirmed the need for such a close remedial fit. 438 U. S., at 362 (joint opinion of Brennan, White, Marshall, and Blackmun, JJ., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part). See United States v. Fordice, 505 U. S. 717, 731 (1992). Ante, at 24–25.
“Race-based programs to remedy the effects of race-based societal discrimination.”
TRANSLATION: The United States Supreme Court betrayed the formerly enslaved Black people because a law, passed in 1867, provided funds for “freedmen or destitute colored people,” pensions, and other payments that they were due. Enslaved Black people had built great wealth, but only for enslavers. 14 Stat. 367–368. Res. of Mar. 16, 1867, No. 4, 15 Stat. 20.
Sharecropping was only one example of race-linked obstacles and “imposed all sorts of disabilities” that the law (and private parties) laid down to hinder the progress and prosperity of former slaves, especially the “colored” servicemen in the Union Army who helped secure bounties of the Civil War.
After the Civil War, Congress debated and passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 contemporaneously with the Fourteenth Amendment with the goal to eradicate the Black Codes enacted by Southern States following ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment. Because the Black Codes focused on race, not just slavery-related status, the Civil Rights Act explicitly recognized that white citizens enjoyed certain rights that non-white citizens did not. See id., at 474. SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting. However, when attempting to remedy the harmed population, the government had enforce a distinction. The purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to remedy the legacy of racial inequalities and to “remedy identified discrimination” with remedies such as cash reparation payments are constitutionally permissible in light of the hundreds of “years of class-based discrimination against Black Americans.” Sotomayor, See id., at 396–402.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and Fourteenth Amendment are “legislation for a particular class of the blacks to the exclusion of all whites.” Contrary to popular belief, the particular class of the blacks with the previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude are permitted legislation strictly for them - to the exclusion of whites. Congress reenacted race-conscious language in the Civil Rights Act of 1870, two years after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Act of May 31, 1870, §16, 16 Stat. 144, where it remains today, see 42 U. S. C. §§1981(a) and 1982 (Rev. Stat. §§1972, 1978).
Congress also made special appropriations and adopted special protections for the bounty and prize money owed to “colored soldiers and sailors” of the Union Army. It “allowed Congress to legislate not merely against slavery itself, but against all the badges and relics of a slave system.” 14 Stat. 357, Res. No. 46, June 15, 1866; Act of Mar. 3, 1869, ch. 122, 15 Stat. 301; Act of Mar. 3, 1873, 17 Stat. 528. A. Amar, America’s Constitution: A Biography 362(2005) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In its 1864 election platform, the Republican Party pledged to amend the Constitution to accomplish the “utter and complete extirpation” of slavery from “the soil of the Republic.” The 1866 Act promised such a sweeping form of equality that it would lead many to say that it exceeded the scope of Congress’ authority under the Thirteenth Amendment. The Act effectively overruled Dred Scott and ensured the equality that had been promised to blacks. 2 A. Schlesinger, History of U. S. Political Parties 1860–1910, p. 1303 (1973). Safeguarding the 1866 Act, including its promise of black citizenship and the equal rights that citizenship entailed, required further submission of the people of the United States in the form of a constitutional amendment. See, e.g., Cong. Globe, 39thCong., 1st Sess., at 498 (statement of Sen. Van Winkle).
On January 29, 1866, Senator Lyman Trumbull, the bill’s principal sponsor in the Senate, proposed text stating that “all persons of African descent born in the United States are hereby declared to be citizens.” Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 474. The following day, Trumbull revised his proposal, removing the reference to “African descent” and declaring more broadly that “all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign Power,” are “citizens of the United States.” Id., at 498. The Thirteenth Amendment allowed Congress not merely to legislate against slavery itself, but also to counter measures “which deprive any citizen of civil rights which are secured to other citizens.” Id., at 474.
Other sources of constitutional authority includes the power of naturalization and the inherent power to protect the rights of citizens. “[N]o discrimination shall be made by any State nor by the United States as to the civil rights of persons because of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” S. Doc. No. 711, 63d Cong., 1st Sess., 31–32 (1915) (reprinting the Journal of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction for the Thirty-Ninth Congress). R. Williams, Originalism and the Other Desegregation Decision, 99 Va. L. Rev. 493, 532–533 (2013).
Justice Thomas wrote in his dissent shifting the framework of burden may be necessary to streamline the litigation around the most commonly litigated case: lawsuits seeking to remedy discrimination against a member of the large population of recently freed black Americans. The “persistent” racial discrimination by state-licensed entities is factual and documented. See 1870 S. C. Acts, at 386. So why is Crowder starting a conversation that’s already finished?
Crowder’s explicit denial of reparations has sparked widespread discussions among Black Americans sick of immigrants arriving in the United States with negative views on reparations and directly contradicting the Freedmen status and the U.S. constitution. Black Americans, the descendants of US chattel slaves, spent days in online audio spaces with titles like okay all you immigrants, including white people time to go and Trump & ICE? say 600 Thugs Arrested in Memphis discussing legitimate policies imperative to uprooting and denaturalizing first, second, and third generation immigrants like Crowder. Initial speculation believes Crowder could have potentially violated several federal statutes, including:
18 U.S.C. § 1015 – False claims to citizenship
18 U.S.C. § 611 – Voting by non-citizens
18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy against the U.S.
Unqualified Feedback Without Eligibility
A first generation immigrant from Canada, is Steven Crowder undermining the nation’s “Anglo-Saxon European” identity formerly known as White? Crowder assumed he was qualified to give an influential opinion or the final say about compensating the descendants of former US chattel slaves simply because he identifies as an Anglo-Saxon European. Although Crowder’s own community of Conservative, Republican, whiny European men make up 90% of America’s mass shooters and terrorists there’s barely a whisper of outrage. Even in the aftermath of the assassination of Charlie Kirk by mentally ill Anglo-Saxon European, Crowder is still more interested in continuing campaigns of sophisticated, organized, and targeted intimidation that prevent a democratic society from functioning properly.
Crowder is against the United States government returning stolen money from the Freedmen’s Bank back to the depositors, he’s against compensating the families of Union soldiers for their bounties and pensions due, or finally paying GI Bills to the families of World War I and World War II soldiers like the 761st Tank Battalion. Nicknamed the “Black Panther” soldiers they were the ones who carried the thin weak emaciated bodies of Ashkenazi Jews out of Nazi death camps in Germany. The Black Panther soldiers were actual hero’s who won the Battle of the Bulge in 1944 France after enduring 183 consecutive days of battle.
IN THIS VIDEO: Emma Ansah is a white woman who boldly breaks down the truth revealing that America’s mass shooters and terrorists are white men. The data screams that white America has a serious problem.
President Trump had at least two separate assassination attempts on his life, but Crowder is not worried about that. There’s been a 1,000 percent increase in attacks on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and politicians are obstructing the Federal Government in addition to aiding and abetting criminal activity (treason) but Crowder is not worried about that. Crowder and his followers are more interested in using physical intimidation to limit the political activity, to change, or direct outcome of policies not yet written. And to add insult to injury, although the gentlemen in the Stevie J’s Sports And Cuts barbershop (Plano, 75093) did a fantastic job debating Crowder, their lineage as descendant of former US chattel slaves was neither confirmed nor verified.
Deport Reparations Deniers Like Conservative Steven Crowder
Trump said the United States needs a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in these criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts. In the September 2025 Presidential Memoranda titled “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” Trump said the White House was ready to recognize that political violence is not a series of isolated incidents and does not emerge organically.
Crowder represents the motivations and patterns of violent and terroristic activities that portray foundational American principles as outrageous to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution. Now, as a result of this interview, Crowder could end up paying a hefty price. Trump created the National Joint Terrorism Task Force to disrupt and prosecute entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation designed to suppress lawful political activity or obstruct the rule of law (including seeking redress). Crowder’s conversation could qualify as evidence of Federal crimes relating to acts of recruiting or radicalizing persons for the purpose of:
(i) political violence, terrorism, or conspiracy against rights; or
(ii) the violent deprivation of any citizen’s rights.
This new law enforcement strategy is supposed to investigates all participants in criminal and terroristic conspiracies — including the organized structures, networks, entities, organizations, funding sources, etc. — that violate the 1965 Naturalization & Immigration Act. By order of the Declaration of Independence, exploiting racial tensions like “Black Fatigue” is now a federal offense or else the citizens with Freedmen status [families of the colored Union soldiers, descendants of former US chattel slaves, FBA, etc] would be well within their right invoke their right to alter or abolish a government that has become destructive. Citizens with Freedmen status have taken it upon themselves to assist investigators by reporting violations.
Traditionally when people make serious statements or express an intent to commit unlawful acts of violence against a particular group or against the Constitutionally protected the punishment is being treated as a true threat and this time is no different. The consensus is the undeportable descendants of chattel slaves are reporting Crowder to ICE now for processing later when the government is funded.
ICE Tip Form
If you would like to report Steven Crowder to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The agency investigates more than 400 violations of criminal law and when you submit detailed information, like the information provided below, through an ICE Tip Form then that will assist investigators track suspected criminal activity and prosecute violations. Specific and detailed information you can copy and paste when reporting Crowder:
Suspected Violation
Other = illegal immigration and human rights violator
Location of Criminal Activity
Stevie Sports & Cuts - North Texas possibly located at 6505 W. Park Blvd, Apt 328, Plano, TX, 75093
Violator Information
Both [individual & company]
YouTube & Louder with Crowder at 3906 Lemmon Ave, Ste 212, Dallas, TX, 75219
Info about Individual
Out of respect for the Crowder family, the residential address will not be published here online. Reminder, if you Google searching the home address of Steven Blake Crowder in Plano, Texas and commit an act of violence then you alone are legally responsible.
Summary of Criminal Activity
I suspect Crowder’s Canadian parents were in violation of Section 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (66. Stat. 175; 8 U.S.C. 1153) and not of good moral character. It seems Crowder’s parents did not teach their son to adhere to the principles of the United States Constitution including the right to redress.
In violation of the April 2025 Executive Order “Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens,” Crowder favored aliens who fit the nation’s “Anglo-Saxon European” identity known as “White” over the Constitutionally protected families of the colored Union soldiers, citizens with Freedmen status, and descendants of former US chattel slaves, as identified in Students for Fair Admissions (2023). Crowder publicly promoted impeding federal law including the First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. I suspect Crowder violated the Racketeer-Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act by conspiring against restorative measures, such as cash reparations payments.
In alignment with Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship, I suspect Steven Crowder’s parents were not legal citizens, or under the jurisdiction, of the United States when Steven was born in 1981. As a citizen with Freedmen status and owner of the 14th Amendment, I want Steven Crowder’s citizenship revoked.
In violation of the July 2025 Executive Order “Ending Crime and Disorder on America’s Streets,” I understood Crowder’s views on reparations directly contradict the U.S. policy of encouraging commitment and providing care for the mentally ill in appropriate facilities for appropriate periods of time to end vagrancy on the streets.
