Freedmen Descendants Stand Up to Claim the 14th Amendment in Supreme Court
Federal Legal Class Files Historic Petition In Domestic And International Courts
The Supreme Court announced it would hear arguments regarding the 14th Amendment and President Trump’s executive order that the Fourteenth Amendment does not guarantee birthright citizenship to immigrants and foreigners from around the world. The court will defer its ruling on the subject until after hearing all arguments for or against on Thursday, May 15th. NPR estimated a decision by late June or early July and in response the grandchildren of former slaves have stepped up to claim their birthright in a big way.
The Freedmen descendants were ready and waiting for Trump to begin his second term in office. Trump’s executive order was all the Freedmen needed to hear to quietly initiate a groundbreaking legal effort to reclaim the 14th Amendment in a court of law. “We were the intended beneficiaries of Reconstruction, not the world’s immigrants,” said Freedmen advocate and activist SwayMe.
Ratified in 1868, the 14th Amendment, federally recognized and granted uncontestable citizenship to the former slaves. Justice Thomas recounted that it was in the wake of the Civil War, that the United States focused its attention on restoring the Union and establishing a legal status for the newly freed slaves. The legal federal status of Freedmen was created and with it came exclusive rights, protections, and privileges.
“We are not allowing the Al Sharpton’s of the world to speak for us because they don’t have the ears of the people,” expressed a 7th Generation Descendant of Emancipated Freedmen in a Twitter Space titled If your dumb ass, really understood ethnicity you’d be hip to the BAND. Listen on X.
Misinterpreted 14th Amendment
To date, every court since Lincoln’s death over 100 years ago, has purposely misinterpreted the language of the 14th Amendment and exploited the gift and privilege of citizenship to every Tom, Dick, and Ahmed from around the world.
In the 2023 Students for Fair Admissions the Supreme Court admitted the previous Justices did Freedmen a great disservice by betraying the colored Union soldiers and descendants of former US chattel slaves. “The betrayal of the court had concrete negative effects,” said Justice Jackson and Harlan in their dissent. The amicus submitted by the Trump administration states birthright citizenship was never meant to grant citizenship to the children of foreign nationals just because they were born on the soil. Trump’s brief argues the original intent of the 14th Amendment was grossly distorted after Lincoln’s assassination and the descendants agree.
The Congress of the Reconstruction created an unbreakable bond and award based debt an obligation between the United States and the persons who toiled the soil of the Americas as the country was being founded. Persons torn apart from their family and forced to bury their loved ones in the soil without comfort. Persons who pledged an unspeakable allegiance to seeing the successful implementation of a fair and just government. A government that honors its commitments to citizenship.
The Italian government recognized the value of its citizenship and reduced its policy of jus sanguinis the “right of blood” to the direct relatives of persons born in Italy after March 17, 1861, when the Kingdom of Italy was proclaimed. However, Italy recently announced tightening its citizenship laws to persons born within two generations of an Italian citizen. If a parent or grandparent was born in Italy then a person may automatically qualify for Italian citizenship. The birthright citizenship of the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 with the same exclusive inheritance for the direct relatives of colored Union soldiers and former US Chattel Slaves.
However now the Trump administration and the Descendants are both concerned about abuse of the amendment by illegal immigrants and the billion dollar underground market of “travel baby factories” in dirty motels. The Trump administration and Freedmen are in agreement, illegal immigrants and dual citizens do not “have an allegiance to the United States” and therefore are not eligible for the birthright citizenship of the Fourteenth Amendment. In an April 19th Twitter space titled SCOTUS Trump’s EO #birthrights: Slavery & 14 AMDT for FREEDMEN more than 400 people came to one logical conclusion:
Most politicians in office are 1st to 3rd generation immigrants and we will no longer allow anyone with dual allegiances, dual citizenships, or divided loyalties to rule over them any longer.
“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon money, possessions, fame, or status more than the Lord.” Matthew 6:24-26. Now that its universally understood that most persons in state or local politics are immigrants then the Freedmen of today want to strip those foreigners (colonizers) of the power they think they earned. Listen on X.
The MetCalf Safety & Protection Bill
Proposed by Congress and ratified by the States after the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no State shall “deny to any person . . . the equal protection of the laws.” According to the Supreme Court’s earlier statements in Students for Fair Admissions the court already explained that the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed “that the law in the States shall be the same for the black as for the white; that all persons, whether colored or white, shall stand equal before the laws of the States.” The Reconstruction Congress was clear— after Lincoln’s assassination they feared the former slaves would be betrayed and therefore created protections solely for the posterity of Freedmen despite being vetoed and opposed by the Irish President from the Democratic Party. Justice Thomas said “Enslaved Black people had built great wealth, but only for enslavers.”
Claiming exclusive rights to the 14th Amendment in Supreme Court means once again the bloodline of neglected but yet exploited citizens are leaping to take control of their labor. The Freedmen class is taking ownership of their financial security without the interruption of others. Why exclude themselves from others? Because Europeans will never stop being hypocrites as noted by Justice Thomas’ dissent “White southerners often “simply refused to sell land to blacks,” even when not selling was economically foolish.”
In the wake of recent public controversies where once again two young European males were emotionally upset they could not exert control over an assumed Freedmen. Because of his skin color, two European males known as the MetCalf twins, assumed they had dominion and control over a Freedmen teenager named Karmelo Anthony. Each twin taller and fifty pounds heavier than the Anthony teenager, the MetCalf twins attacked Karmelo Anthony. The twins verbally and physically assaulted the young man and although adults were nearby no one corrected the twins or took control over the situation.
Anthony was left with no other choice but to defend himself. When Anthony finally took action to defend himself he took the life of one of the twins. In traditional fashion, despite being an honor student, Anthony was immediately demonized in the media and news. The Anthony family was harassed, random people showed up to the Anthony house uninvited, and a Protect White People rally was held on April 19th.
In response to the attacks and the rally to promote the safety and protections for white people, Freedmen are standing on their 14th Amendment right to be exempt from unfriendly laws and began drafting the MetCalf Safety & Protection Bill. Europeans who identify as white assume they have unlimited control over who those they assume are former slaves. Why did the Metcalf twins think they had control over the Anthony teenager? Because he had dark colored skin.
Freedmen are finally putting an end to nonstop hypocritical attacks from Europeans with the MetCalf Safety & Protection Bill. This bill identifies “passive aggressive acts intended to destabilize, humiliate, or erase a specific ethnic group.” This bill makes boundaries, punishment, and compensation clear: when Europeans and foreigners attack Freedmen those victims and survivors will should be immediate compensation of $250,000 from the city municipal law enforcement police budget while the crime is being investigated. Another $250,000 would be paid from the State law enforcement budget and the last $250,000 would be paid from the $1 trillion federal defense budget. Nearly completed the bill will go through community revisions over the next two weeks. Several Republican Congressmen are being considered to sponsor the MetCalf bill. Freedmen are approaching politicians who are already public supporters of altering birthright citizenship, politicians like Rep. Brian Babin.
Allegations of Genocide and International Accountability
In what may be the most explosive development in the fight to claim exclusive use of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the Freedmen descendants of Black American Negroes filed historic evidence of genocide against the United Nations in the International Crimes Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ) in January 2025. Since colonizers deemed the United States a nation of immigrants then every nation that sent settlers is culpable. They are all guilty and need to be held accountable.
Italy, Ireland, Spain, and Israel all claim they “built America” therefore each nation is collectively and individually accused of sending their citizens to colonize the United States and willingly participating in the “silent erasure of the American Negro.”
In addition to filing charges of genocide in international court, on March 24th, 2025 the Freedmen Reparations Fund Trust formally affirmed the political status of Freedmen as persons who trace their lineage to individuals emancipated from U.S. chattel slavery. Because the Freedmen descendants are unapologetic about reclaiming exclusive use of the Reconstruction Amendments— the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments—retroactively and without mercy. Read the Declaration.
United in protecting the integrity and identity of former slaves, in 2025 the descendants of Black American Negroes are simultaneously charging allegations of genocide in international courts, writing the MetCalf Safety & Protection bill, and making a stance in the Supreme Court.
The widely shared belief of the descendant group is that the application of birthright citizenship should be retroactive. President Johnson intentionally designed immigration through Ellis Island to disregard the Constitutional protections and boundaries of the country’s founding charter. Retroactive citizenship could undo the Naturalization and Immigration Act of 1965 and reduce the number of citizenship for violent terrorists who entered through Ellis Island in the year 1900 or earlier. The general consensus is that people want to remove immigrants from the Supreme Court but don’t want to undo Trump’s citizenship. Trump has proven to be useful and the descendants still have use for him and his second presidency. “We’re not necessarily trying to be cruel,” argued a Twitter user. “We’re trying to survive.”
What Comes Next?
In a time when identity is regularly politicized, the descendants of former slaves are publicly declaring their right to self identify and represent themselves. Not allowing anyone else to speak for them, the Freedmen class is speaking out in media, on the street, and in the Supreme Court.
Taking full responsibility for shockwaves of cultural and political unrest all over the world, the Descendant class is acting out a bold legal strategy of forcing a global reckoning and next on the agenda is resolving the unfinished business of Reconstruction.
Regardless of what the Supreme Court decides after hearing arguments on May 15th, the Descendants have already started making plans to deport immigrant politicians for the summer. Starting with the descendants most treasonous politicians first, this summer politicians who are obvious agents of foreign nations are going to be removed from their positions and then deported from the country. Descendants from all over the nation, for profit organization, and nonprofit political entities are preparing the public now and then during the summer of 2025 the descendants of former slaves will be activating their Freedmen status and Constitutional protections to remove immigrant politicians from offices all over the nation.
How can a group of citizens deport a politician? Thanks to the open case in International Crimes Court and the support of Trump’s Department of Justice the summer of 2025 will be another historic step in solidifying Freedmen as the greatest persons to have ever graced the planet. After all, it was the Radical Republicans, the party of the emancipated slaves, who were probably the greatest political minds this country has ever seen and their children have been wise enough to learn from the lessons of their ancestors and others. After watching the drama South Africa faced trying to remove colonizers these Americans are using more of a solo approach to removing foreign invaders.
“We wanted the same ethnic separation and economic isolation that the colonizers [Asians, Africans, and Latinos] had…Let them go live in those countries they say they love so much,” one organizer explained. “We don’t need them. We don’t need foreign factories, we don’t need foreign manufacturing, or foreign allegiances. They need us—we are the foundation of the United States and the United States used to be the economic engine of the world.”
