Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roland Dunham, II's avatar

I got up left and went to sleep on the whole Super Bowl, salute on the article!

Kojo Easy Damptey's avatar

I do get your sentiment. I am in full agreement that there is anti-Black racism within certain Latino spaces; however, the focus on language alone as an excluding factor falls into the very ideas of anti-Black racism. I would say this, though: there are Black folks all over the world and in America that speak Spanish, there are Afro-Latinos that speak Spanish, Black folks from the Caribbean that speak Spanish and there is a large segment of the USA population that speaks Spanish, so the premise of using language as a deciding factor of what language is used at the Super Bowl is quite frankly no substantial.

Secondly, let's also remember that the very ideals of anti-Black racism are baked into English, which is from the Imperial logics of the monarchy of England; maybe there is value in destabilizing this idea that English is the one and only language that needs to be spoken on one of the largest musical stages. As per your own analysis, historical hierarchies employ the use of English to perpetuate ongoing forms of racism.

You used a Spanish word in this article, would you suppose then that by using a Spanish word you are excluding people from reading this article? I would say "no." All languages are valid and need to be celebrated. Let's not forget that for people of African descent across the world, some have lost their traditional languages because they were forced to speak English.

Finally, I am not against your argument about anti-Black racism, I am saying let's not fall into the colonial practices that blind us from focusing on the many forms of White supremacy.

No posts

Ready for more?